Why is India still a developing country and what is stopping it from being a developed country
This particular question strikes me every time when I read something about India’s education
system. I see India’s education system as a stumbling block towards its objectives of achieving
inclusive growth.
Let me inform you about certain startling facts. India is going to experience a paradox of
nearly million people
joining the workforce but most of them will lack requiste skills and the mindset for
productive employment according to a report in DNA. India has about 550 million people under the
age of years out of which only 11% are enrolled in tertiary institutions compared to the
world average of
I wouldn’t be laying too much emphasis on the drawbacks of India’s public education system
because it has been an issue well debated over in the past and the main flaws have already
been pointed out before. I will be focusing on how the education system’s failure is leading
to another social issue of income inequality and hence, suggest certain policies to improve
India’s education system and reduce inequality.
The really critical aspect of Indian public education system is its low quality. The actual
quantity of schooling that children experience and the quality of teaching they receive are
extremely insufficient in government schools. A common feature in all government schools is
the poor quality of education, with weak infrastructure and inadequate pedagogic attention.
What the government is not realising right now is that education which is a source of human
capital can create wide income inequalities. It will be surprising to see how income inequalities
are created within the same group of educated people.Let me illustrate this with the help of an
example:
Let us take P be an individual who has had no primary or higher education. His human capital
is zero and hence it bears no returns. Let be an individual who completed his MBA from S.P
Jain college and let R be an individual who completed his MBA from Ahmadabad. The average
rate of return for an MBA student is . gets a rate of return of and
R gets a rate of return of due to the difference in the reputation and quality of the
management school. Let the income of and be .In a period of years, will be having
the same income as he does not possess human capital. For the same time period will earn an
income of and will earn an income . Now lets see what
happens when the rate of return on human capital doubles. Earnings of P will not change since
he does not have any human capital. Now Q is going to earn . going to
earn . Flabbergasting! As soon as return on human capital increases
proportionate
ly income inequality increases. With return on human capital doubling, income increases by
and income increases by.
The above example just shows the effect of the quality of human capital n income inequality.
if the government does not improve education system particularly in rural areas the rich will
which will also be a step towards reducing income inequality
No comments:
Post a Comment